ColoradoIn committee2026 Regular Session

SB26-112 Court Actions Related to Failure to Appear in Court

Latest: Mar 9, 2026 · Senate Second Reading Lost with Amendments - Committee, Floor

What it means

Our plain-English summary and constitutional analysis for this bill is not published yet. Every analysis is reviewed by an editor before it appears here.

How they voted

4 committee, procedural and amendment votes

Senate: COW * (S.001)

17 yes · 16 no · 2 other

Mar 23, 2026 · Result: fail

PartyYesNoOther / excused
Democratic5162
Republican12––
How each member voted (35)

Party shown is each member's current party in our records. Official vote record

Senate: Adopt amendment L.002 (Attachment K)

? yes · ? no

Mar 9, 2026 · Result: pass

Member-by-member votes are not loaded for this roll call yet. The tally above is from the official record.

Party shown is each member's current party in our records. Official vote record

Senate: Adopt amendment L.005 (Attachment L)

5 yes · 2 no

Mar 9, 2026 · Result: pass

PartyYesNo
Democratic32
Republican2–
How each member voted (7)

Party shown is each member's current party in our records. Official vote record

Senate: Refer Senate Bill 26-112, as amended, to the Committee of the Whole.

4 yes · 3 no

Mar 9, 2026 · Result: pass

PartyYesNo
Democratic23
Republican2–
How each member voted (7)

Party shown is each member's current party in our records. Official vote record

Where it stands

  1. Feb 11, 2026 · Senate

    Introduced

    Introduced In Senate - Assigned to Judiciary

  2. Mar 9, 2026 · Senate

    Sent to committee

    Senate Committee on Judiciary Refer Amended to Senate Committee of the Whole

Full official history (10 actions)
  • Feb 11, 2026SenateIntroduced In Senate - Assigned to Judiciary
  • Mar 9, 2026SenateSenate Committee on Judiciary Refer Amended to Senate Committee of the Whole
  • Mar 12, 2026SenateSenate Second Reading Laid Over to 03/13/2026 - No Amendments
  • Mar 13, 2026SenateSenate Second Reading Laid Over to 03/16/2026 - No Amendments
  • Mar 16, 2026SenateSenate Second Reading Laid Over to 03/17/2026 - No Amendments
  • Mar 17, 2026SenateSenate Second Reading Laid Over to 03/18/2026 - No Amendments
  • Mar 18, 2026SenateSenate Second Reading Laid Over to 03/19/2026 - No Amendments
  • Mar 19, 2026SenateSenate Second Reading Laid Over to 03/20/2026 - No Amendments
  • Mar 20, 2026SenateSenate Second Reading Laid Over to 03/23/2026 - No Amendments
  • Mar 23, 2026SenateSenate Second Reading Lost with Amendments - Committee, Floor

Supporters and opponents

No documented positions yet. Every position we list links to its public source.

Official summary

Read the official summary (openstates)
Under current law, a court is required to release a person on a personal recognizance bond if the person was charged with an offense for a violation with a maximum penalty that does not exceed 6 months' imprisonment and the court cannot require the person to give security of any kind for their appearance for trial other than their personal recognizance, unless certain conditions exist. The bill clarifies that these provisions apply in both state and municipal courts. The bill adds to the conditions for which a person may be required to give security that the defendant previously failed to appear in court 2 or more times in the present case.Existing law prohibits a court from imposing a monetary condition of release for a defendant charged with a traffic offense, petty offense, or comparable municipal offense, or a municipal offense for which there is no comparable state misdemeanor offense, with specified exceptions. The bill adds exceptions for:A petty offense for theft, criminal mischief, or arson, or a comparable municipal offense, or a municipal offense involving threats of violence, injury, or property damage, if the defendant has previously failed to appear in court 2 or more times in the present case; andAny other petty offense, traffic offense, or a comparable municipal offense, or a municipal offense for which there is no comparable state offense, if the defendant has previously failed to appear for a court proceeding 2 or more times in the present case and has another pending charge for the same offense in the same jurisdiction.The bill states that if a defendant's counsel is present at a court proceeding as required by a court and the defendant is not present, with the exceptions of trial, arraignment, contested hearings, and hearings in which a witness or victim is testifying before the court, the defendant's absence may not be considered a failure to appear. The bill applies the exceptions involving previous instances of a defendant's failure to appear for a municipal court proceeding only when, prior to issuing a warrant for the arrest of the defendant for the previous failure to appear, the court conducted a search to determine whether the defendant was being held in a correctional facility or county jail, and at the time of the previous failure to appear, the court had certain processes in place governing failures to appear.The bill requires municipal courts to not consider a person's absence from a place and time specified in a summons or summons and complaint as a failure to appear if the person's counsel is present on their behalf.(Note: This summary applies to this bill as introduced.)